Last week we went to a debate about the use of Dutch, French and English in greater Brussels. This is, not to put a fine point on it, a big issue in Belgium, with multiple governments being toppled over the language spoken in an area spanning 0.5% of the country.
Belgium has, quite frankly, some of the most obnoxious language laws you can imagine. Picture the type of legislation that the Tea Party would like to pass against Spanish speakers in Arizona and you are probably getting close to it. For example, Flanders is monolingual, so all interactions with the government must occur in Dutch. With the exception of a few regions with "facilities", if you talk to a government official, they must communicate to you in Dutch. Even if they speak perfectly good French or English, and you don't speak Dutch, it is against the law for them to talk to you in your native language. Private companies have a bit more leeway, but even in a private company based in Flanders all job interviews must be performed in Dutch, regardless of whether the position requires knowledge of Dutch. Even conversations between employees in private companies must be performed in Dutch if there is a power imbalance (ie, a boss has to talk to his employees in Dutch, but two equally ranked employees can talk to each other in whatever language they want). Brussels is even more absurd - it is often said that Brussels is officially bilingual, but a more accurate description would be to say that Brussels is officially dual monolingual. There are Dutch schools and French schools in Belgium, but they are legally prohibited from bilingual teaching. Even private companies are allowed to give out Dutch payslips or French payslips, but bilingual payslips are illegal. The only service that has to be performed in a bilingual manner is emergency hospital services, so perhaps Belgium is one small step above the Tea Party.
Fortunately, while the Belgian language laws are obnoxious, Belgians in general are not. When I interact with either French or Dutch speaking government officials, most are happy to talk to me in English if they are able to. My job interview was conducted entirely in English. No one has yet demanded that I talk to my (non-Dutch speaking) employees in Dutch. Everyone is actually quite reasonable and ignores the more absurd laws - I would dare say that many Belgians may not even know some of them exist. Of course, there are some obnoxious pests even in Belgium, and I bet that the wrong person in the wrong position could cause an enormous amount of fuss if they had an encyclopedic knowledge of Belgian law.
Anyway, the debate was essentially on language changes in and around Brussels. The second speaker, Philippe Van Parijs, made some really interesting points:
1. There is no need to fear a "Brussels oil spill" of French taking over Flanders. Dutch language competence in Flanders is over 99% for 18-24 year olds. The second greatest native language among this age group is Turkish (~2%) while the second greatest spoken language is English (~90%).
2. Brussels is changing, but through demographic shifts not language shifts. Whereas ~25% of the 65+ age bracket is native Dutch-speaking, less than 5% of the 18-24 age bracket is. Immigration is probably the single biggest factor, with Arabic and Turkish being the second and third largest native languages spoken in Brussels youths. In total, 1/3 of Brussels is non-Belgian, and are either English speakers or immigrants who elect to learn French rather than Dutch. Despite this decline in Dutch native speakers, Dutch as a second language is great than it ever has been before, both in absolute numbers and in the proportion of the population.
3. Language learning is not simply a matter of effort. People must have the motivation and opportunity, and this is not as simple as just providing free classes. One of the most interesting points he brought up was the "max-min" language choice, which is that a group of people will always talk in the language which is spoken the best by the person who speaks it the least. So when I hang out with my Dutch-speaking friends they all turn to English, because they speak better English than I speak Dutch. Likewise we know French-Dutch couples that talk to each other in English because each know it better than the do the other's native tongue.
Best of all, he had a practical and ethical solution to the "BHV" crisis:
1. Brussels should enlarge to include mixed language areas. Brussels is an economic powerhouse of Belgium, accounting for 20% of the economy (and only 10% of the population), and the reality is that Brussels is larger than the official border. 56% of jobs in Brussels are actually taken by commuters who live outside the official border, but who are economically and culturally within Brussels. To be politically palitable, equal areas of land from Flanders and Walloon should be added to Brussels, including both BHV and Walloon commuter towns such as Waterloo.
2. Brussels should become trilingual, rather than dual monolingual. Add English as an official language. Phase out Dutch schools and French schools and have bilingual schools, so that all children will be taught in both languages. Allow higher education in English as well as Dutch and French. Don't use "facilities" which encourage monolingualism to persist for generations, just embrace both cultures.
These are the most sensible proposals that I have yet heard on the language situation in Belgian. He doesn't stubbornly demand that land has a native language that is immutable ("otherwise we would all have to speak Welsh"), but also makes an effort to bridge the divide with Flemish nationalists - proposing that Walloon give up land equal to that of Flanders and that Dutch education be provided to all children within Brussels. I'd vote for Van Parijs for PM!
As another example of how obnoxious the language issue can get in Belgium, here is a case of N-VA interfering with a private supermarket having bilingual signs in their stores. You would think that the N-VA would be busy trying to form a government, but the truth is that they are prefectly happy with Flemish independence by default and would rather spend their time harrassing bilingual businesses than actually trying to govern. Bah!